Editorial Note
The constitutional claims discussed here are allegations in a federal lawsuit filed August 12, 2026. No court has ruled on them. Trump Media disputes the plaintiffs’ characterization of Truth API and says the service delivers publicly available information through technology commonly used in financial markets. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump
Wall Street has always paid for speed.
Traders spend enormous amounts of money shaving fractions of a second off the time it takes them to receive information and act on it. Financial-data companies have built entire businesses around delivering information faster and in formats computers can immediately digest.
Nothing especially sinister about that.
Then the president of the United States enters the feed.
Trump Media & Technology Group announced Truth API in July and launched it August 1. The company describes it as a business-to-business data service offering licensed, low-latency access to posts from some of Truth Social’s most prominent accounts.
And Trump Media is remarkably candid about who it built this thing for.
Its SEC-filed announcement says Truth API is designed for organizations “most impacted by the cost of a delay in information,” specifically naming high-frequency and algorithmic trading firms. It says posts are delivered to customers in milliseconds.
Trump Media’s CEO Kevin McGurn put it even more plainly:
“Markets already move on Truth Social posts.” SEC Filing — Truth API Announcement
That brings us to Wednesday’s lawsuit.
The Intercept and Freedom of the Press Foundation sued President Donald Trump and several White House officials in federal court in New York, arguing that the arrangement gives paying customers preferential access to official presidential communications and violates the First and Fifth Amendments.
The complaint says Truth API costs $100,000 per month, or $60,000 per month with a three-year commitment. CBS independently reported the same $60,000-to-$100,000 price range based on comments from McGurn. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump | CBS News
The plaintiffs call that “advance access.”
Trump Media describes it differently.
According to the company, the underlying posts are publicly available. What customers are buying is a licensed, automated feed capable of getting those posts into their systems faster than somebody manually refreshing Truth Social—or, more importantly, faster than an automated system relying on less direct methods of collecting the information. SEC Filing — Truth API Announcement
That distinction matters.
It also doesn’t make my concern go away.
Before I keep going…
Your subscription helps fund reporting, research, publishing, new features, and the continued growth of every Tom Hicks Media publication.
THE LATENCY GAP IS THE PRODUCT
Here’s the sentence I keep coming back to.
In its August 10 SEC filing, Trump Media said:
“Truth API closes the latency gap for organizations that place a premium on prompt, verified access to public information found on Truth Social.”
That isn’t something a critic said.
That’s the company describing its own product.
The same filing says Truth API was already generating revenue and had signed more than ten customer agreements. SEC Filing — August 10 Earnings Release
So we can stop arguing about whether speed has value here. Trump Media says it does. The customers apparently think it does, and the product exists specifically for organizations where delays cost money.
CBS reported that the direct customers are primarily high-frequency trading firms. McGurn acknowledged on an investor call that customers receive public posts “fractionally faster.” The difference may be measured in milliseconds, but as former White House ethics lawyer and securities-law professor Richard Painter told CBS, milliseconds make a difference in high-frequency trading. CBS News
Now put Donald Trump into that equation.
His Truth Social account isn’t just where he complains about Democrats, journalists, or whoever pissed him off before breakfast.
He uses it to announce government policy.
The federal complaint documents Truth Social posts involving tariffs, military operations, foreign affairs, domestic policy, appointments, and firings. It also cites a February 2026 statement from then-White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters that a Trump Truth Social post should be regarded as administration policy. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump
That changes the conversation.
I don’t care if somebody wants to charge Wall Street ten grand a minute for celebrity gossip delivered by carrier pigeon.
Official presidential information is different.
The public isn’t entitled to a free Bloomberg terminal.
It is entitled to a presidency that doesn’t come with a VIP lane.
THE PUBLIC JOB AND THE PRIVATE BUSINESS
Then there’s the financial relationship.
Trump remains the largest shareholder in Trump Media through the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust. The lawsuit says the trust holds roughly 41.4% of the company and that Trump is its sole beneficiary. CBS, citing FactSet, independently puts his ownership at approximately 41%, worth about $1 billion. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump | CBS News
That is what makes this different from Reuters selling a faster newswire.
Reuters doesn’t decide when the United States announces a tariff.
Bloomberg doesn’t control when the president says military operations are beginning or ending.
Donald Trump creates some of the information that gives this particular feed its value while retaining a very large financial interest in the company selling the feed.
I’m not inventing a quid pro quo here. I haven’t seen evidence that Trump times posts to benefit Truth API customers, coordinates announcements with traders or changes government policy because somebody bought a subscription.
We don’t need any of that to ask the obvious question.
Should a president have a personal financial interest in selling faster delivery of his own official statements?
I think the answer is no.
And I’m having a hard time understanding why that answer should be controversial.
THERE’S ALSO A SIX-HOUR DEAL — WITH AN IMPORTANT CATCH
There’s another piece of this story that needs to be handled carefully.
Trump has a longstanding agreement with Trump Media involving a six-hour Truth Social exclusivity period for posts from his personal profile.
But there’s an important exception.
The 2024 agreement filed with the SEC specifically allows Trump to post communications involving government, politics, political messaging and related subjects on other social-media platforms without waiting six hours. SEC Filing — Trump/TMTG Social Media Agreement
That means it would be wrong to say Trump is contractually required to keep official government announcements exclusive to Truth Social for six hours.
He isn’t.
The lawsuit argues that, in practice, he frequently posts official information there without simultaneously posting it elsewhere. That is the plaintiffs’ factual allegation, supported in the complaint with examples and posting data. It is not the same thing as saying the contract forces him to do it. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump
That distinction actually makes my next question harder to dodge.
If Trump is free to release official government information simultaneously through government channels or other platforms…why doesn’t he?
TRUMP MEDIA HAS A DEFENSE
Trump Media says the criticism misunderstands both the technology and the market.
The company told AP that information from Trump is distributed by countless platforms and news organizations, many of which sell subscription APIs. It accused the plaintiffs of trying to use the courts to censor Trump and hurt company shareholders. Associated Press
CBS reported a similar response. Trump Media emphasized that Truth API deals in public information, and McGurn called the ethical criticism “misguided.” CBS News
There is a legitimate point buried in there.
APIs and low-latency feeds aren’t corrupt.
Charging financial firms a fortune for information that machines can process faster than human beings can read it isn’t some new invention Donald Trump dreamed up after lunch.
But Trump Media’s defense keeps running into the same wall.
Its most valuable information source is also the president.
The company itself marketed Truth API by saying markets move on Truth Social posts.
That’s not me connecting dots with yarn and pushpins.
That came from Trump Media. SEC Filing — Truth API Announcement
THE SIMPLE FIX
There is an almost embarrassingly easy way to make most of this controversy disappear.
When Donald Trump makes an official government announcement, publish it simultaneously through a government-controlled public channel.
White House website. Official government feed. Whatever. Then, Trump Media can sell whatever technological advantage remains.
Charge customers for machine-readable formatting, archives, and feeds from other Truth Social accounts. Charge them for analytics, search tools, and a little guy who rings a bell every time Trump hits “Post” if somebody is willing to pay for it.
Just separate official presidential information from the commercial advantage.
If the same government announcement becomes publicly available through an official channel at essentially the same time Trump posts it to Truth Social, the ethical problem gets considerably smaller.
And if doing that would reduce the value of Truth API? Oh, well.
That would tell us something pretty important about what customers were paying for.
IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
The plaintiffs say yes.
Their complaint argues that preferential access to presidential announcements violates First Amendment principles governing equal access to official information and that the price creates an unconstitutional condition under the Fifth Amendment.
They are asking the court to stop the administration from giving paying Truth API customers preferential access to official government information. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump
Whether those legal theories survive is for the court to decide.
A complaint is an argument, not a verdict.
But legality isn’t the only standard available to the rest of us.
A president receives information and authority because the public handed him an office. When he uses that authority to announce tariffs, foreign-policy moves, appointments or military decisions, the timing of those announcements should not become more valuable because his private company found customers willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars a month for a faster pipe.
Maybe a judge eventually decides the Constitution permits it.
Then Congress ought to decide whether the law should.
Because “technically legal” has never been a particularly inspiring ethical standard for the presidency.
And neither has:
$100,000 a month for the good seats.
THE RECORD
Truth API was announced July 16 and launched August 1. Trump Media says it provides institutional customers with licensed, low-latency, machine-readable access to publicly available posts from leading Truth Social accounts. SEC Filing — Truth API Announcement
Trump Media openly markets speed as the value proposition. Its filings say the service is intended for organizations affected by the cost of delayed information and that it “closes the latency gap.” SEC Filing — Truth API Announcement
The company says Truth API already has more than ten customer agreements. Trump Media reported that figure in its August 10 earnings release filed with the SEC. SEC Filing — August 10 Earnings Release
Pricing reportedly runs from $60,000 to $100,000 per month. The federal complaint says customers pay $100,000 monthly, or $60,000 with a three-year commitment. CBS independently reported the same range from the company’s CEO. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump | CBS News
Trump retains a major financial stake in Trump Media. The complaint puts the trust holding his shares at approximately 41.43% of the company; CBS, citing FactSet, reports approximately 41%. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump | CBS News
The constitutional claims have not been adjudicated. The Intercept and Freedom of the Press Foundation filed the lawsuit August 12 in the Southern District of New York. Trump Media disputes their characterization of the service. Federal Complaint — The Intercept Media v. Trump | Associated Press
THE BULLSHIT DETECTOR
NO, COVID VACCINES DIDN’T CAUSE AN 82% MISCARRIAGE RATE
Sen. Ron Johnson claimed COVID vaccines were associated with an “82% miscarriage rate” among women vaccinated during the first or second trimester. That figure comes from a years-old misreading of preliminary pregnancy data, not an 82% miscarriage finding. PolitiFact reviewed the claim again this week and found Johnson had distorted the original 2021 study; subsequent research has repeatedly found no increased miscarriage risk associated with COVID vaccination. Recycling bad math for five years doesn’t eventually turn it into science. PolitiFact
NO, ABDUL EL-SAYED DIDN’T CALL FOR SHARIA LAW IN AMERICA
Social-media posts claimed Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed had openly called for Sharia law in the United States. The supposed evidence was an edited portion of a 2022 speech. PolitiFact reviewed the fuller remarks and found El-Sayed was discussing an Oklahoma attempt to ban Sharia law while making an argument about religious discrimination and constitutional rights. You can dislike the candidate without putting words in his mouth. PolitiFact
NO, PRICES AREN’T “ALL COMING DOWN”
Trump said recently that prices were “all coming down” and specifically included food and groceries. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday that consumer prices in July were 3.4% higher than a year earlier, food prices were up 3.0%, and groceries were up 2.7%. Some individual categories fell, and the overall inflation rate eased slightly from June. That’s useful context. It still doesn’t turn rising prices into falling ones. Bureau of Labor Statistics | PolitiFact
THE BULLSHIT DETECTOR
Political spin isn’t getting any harder to spot. It’s getting more sophisticated.
The Tom Hicks Bullshit Detector breaks down the tricks politicians, pundits, influencers, and even news organizations use to manipulate conversations without you realizing it. Learn to recognize logical fallacies, emotional manipulation, cherry-picked statistics and arguments that collapse the moment you put them under a microscope.
Available now for $4.95 in the Tom Hicks Media Store. All Off Script subscribers receive it FREE as part of their membership.
MORE FROM TOM HICKS MEDIA
Lotus Purrspective
Life, humans and their strange behavior — explained by the cat who has apparently been assigned to supervise all of us.
Tom’s Number Ones
Music history, chart archaeology, forgotten hits and the songs that refuse to stay dead.
Panic Room Sports
Everyone reacts. We’ll check the tape first.
All are free to subscribe.
BUY ME A CUP OF TEA
Off Script is reader-funded. No corporate sponsors are paying me to look the other way, and no political party is deciding which bullshit counts.
If you want to help keep the reporting, research, and publishing going, you can buy me a cup of tea.
[BUY ME A CUP OF TEA]
ONE QUESTION BEFORE YOU GO
Should official presidential announcements be released through a government channel at the same time they appear on a privately owned platform?
#OffScript #TruthSocial #TruthAPI #DonaldTrump #PressFreedom #GovernmentEthics #FirstAmendment